Adelman, J. S., Marquis, S. J., & Sabatos-DeVito, M. G. (2010). Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science, 21, 1799–1801. Arditi, A., Knoblauch, K., & Grunwald, I. (1990). Reading with fixed and variable character pitch. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 7, 2011–2015. Bernard, J. -B., & Chung, S. T. L. (2011). The dependence of crowding on flanker complex- ity and target–flanker similarity. Journal of Vision, 11(8), 1–16 (1). Chanceaux, M., & Grainger, J. (2012). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, symbols, and shapes in peripheral vision. Acta Psychologica, 141, 149–158. Chanceaux, M., Mathôt, S., & Grainger, J. (2013). Flank to the left, flank to the right: Testing the modified receptive field hypothesis of letter-specific crowding. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25, 774–780. Chung, S. T. L. (2002). The effect of letter spacing on reading speed in central and periph- eral vision. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 43, 1270–1276. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35. Grainger, J., Tydgat, I., & Isselé, J. (2010). Crowding affects letters and symbols differ- ently. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 673–688. Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1–24). New York: Nova Science Publishers. Johnson, R. L., & Eisler, M. E. (2012). The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 336–351. Legge, G. E., Pelli, D.G., Rubin, G. S., & Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vision Research, 25, 239–252. Perea, M., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gomez, P. (2011). The effects of inter letter spacing in visual-word recognition. Acta Psychologica, 137, 345–351. Scaltritti, M., & Balota, D. A. (2013). Are all letters processed equally in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first-letter advantage. Acta Psychologica, 144, 397–410. Stevens, M., & Grainger, J. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 133–151. Tripathy, S. P., & Cavanagh, P. (2002). The extent of crowding in peripheral vision does not scale with target size. Vision Research, 42, 2357–2369. Tripathy, S., Cavanagh, P., & Bedell, H. (2013, May). Large interaction zones for visual crowding for briefly presented peripheral stimuli. Poster session presented at 13th Annual Meeting of Vision Science Society, Naples, Florida. Tydgat, I., & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits, and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480–498. Vinkcier, F., Qiao, E., Pallier, C., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011). The impact of letter spacing on reading: A test of the bigram coding hypothesis. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–21. Whitney, C. (2008). Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model. Language & Cognitive Processes, 23, 824–865. Yu, D., Cheung, S. -H., Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. L. (2007). Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of Vision, 7, 1–10. Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, L., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., et al. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 11455–11459.